Mental practice · motor imagery · imagined press

Mental practice raised force. The hand stayed still.

JM Thomas · 21 August 2026

You sit down and pick a press you already know. You run that press in your head. The finger stays on the table.

Mental practice is rehearsing the move in your mind. Motor imagery is the lab name for that same rehearsal. The hand stays still.

Dark lime drawing of a pinky that does not move, next to a denser motor-strip patch for the finger.
A pinky that stays put, next to a denser finger patch.

You already run the move in your head

You pick a press you can see, a little finger against a table or a key on a piano you already play. You close your eyes and run that press from the inside. The wood under the finger does not shift.

You want that picture to do some of the work. You already keep a vision board for the prize. You still want the rehearsal itself to count.

Keep the board. The job on this page is the press you can run without lifting the finger.

They imagined the press

Yue and Cole printed this in 1992 in Journal of Neurophysiology. The paper title is “Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions.”

They asked people to imagine a hard press of a little finger. The group trained that picture for four weeks. Force rose.

A second group pressed for real and rose more. A third group skipped both the imagine and the press and barely moved.

Read the paper at doi.org/10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1114 and at europepmc.org/article/MED/1597701.

The muscle tape stayed quiet

EMG is a muscle tape. They stuck that tape on the muscle while people imagined the press. The tape stayed quiet most of the time.

They also tapped the muscle itself. That tap is twitch force, a check on the meat. The tap stayed the same.

The other hand rose a little too. The finger on the table still gained force, and the muscle belly on that tap did not change.

Later different work from Ranganathan in 2004 ran a longer stretch of internal imagery, meaning they imagined the press from inside the body. Pham and Taylor in 1999 compared picturing the steps with picturing the prize. Those notes sit with the papers at the bottom.

Dark lime split. Left an A on a fridge. Right an open book timed as a real move.
A prize picture on the left. A real move on the right.

Keep the vision board

A vision board is a picture people already pin when they want the prize on the wall. Keep it.

The board can hold the house, the grade, or the lift you want. The rehearsal on this page is one real move you already know, run in your head, with the hand still.

If you want a page about vision boards, open the vision boards page. If you want a page about slow breathing, open the resonant breathing page. More files sit in the Library.

Questions that come up when the finger stays on the table

Do I move the finger?

Leave the finger on the table. The study used a press people imagined.

Do I drop the vision board?

Keep the board. Rehearse one real move next to it.

Do I need a lab?

The lab is how they watched force rise. Your job this week is one real move in your head.

Rehearse one real move this week

This week, pick one real move you already know and rehearse it with the hand still. Keep the vision board.

You wanted the picture to count while the finger stayed on the table. Yue and Cole watched a finger that never left the table, and force still rose. Run the move in your head this week.

If you need care, call a doctor you trust.

Sources

Yue, G., and Cole, K.J. “Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions.” Journal of Neurophysiology 1992;67(5):1114-1123. DOI 10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1114. PMID 1597701. Imagining n=10. +22.03% vs contraction +29.75% vs control +3.68%. 4 weeks. EMG quiet ~80%. Twitch force unchanged. Contralateral ~10%. doi.org/10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1114 · europepmc.org/article/MED/1597701

Ranganathan 2004. Later different work. +35%. 12 weeks. Internal imagery.

Pham and Taylor 1999. Later different work. Process +6.60 vs outcome -1.96.